Skip to main content

Par Lama Mahnoud PhD en génie mécanique à l’Université de Concordia

Dans le cadre du mois de septembre et de sa thématique « Je lis la science », le magazine Al13 présente chaque semaine un texte de la communauté universitaire du Centre de recherche sur l’aluminium REGAL.

Cette semaine, c’est l’étudiante au doctorat de l’Université Concordia, Lama Mahmoud, qui explique comment l’innovation peut se manifester en ayant l’idée originale de mettre en commun des solutions implantées en silo. Pour réduire les émissions de CO2 de la production d’aluminium, l’étudiante met de l’avant la collaboration entre les idées pour créer un nouveau concept plus efficace!

Houshang Alamdari

Directeur du Centre de recherche sur l’aluminium REGAL

Professeur titulaire
Département de génie des mines, de la métallurgie et des matériaux, Université Laval


[FR] Lama Mahmoud est titulaire d’un baccalauréat en génie électrique (Université Khalifa) et d’une maîtrise en science des matériaux (Institut Masdar), où elle a mené des recherches sur la durée de vie des batteries au lithium-ion à l’aide de nanostructures de LiFePO₄/carbone. Elle y a étudié les dispositifs de mémoire destinés aux applications nucléaires, a enseigné aux universités Zayed et Al-Ain, puis a entrepris un doctorat en génie mécanique à l’Université Concordia en 2024.

[EN] Lama Mahmoud holds a BA in Electrical Engineering (Khalifa University) and an MSc in Materials Science (Masdar Institute), researching lithium-ion battery life via LiFePO4/Carbon nanostructures. She studied memory devices for nuclear applications there, taught at Zayed and Al-Ain Universities, then began a Mechanical Engineering PhD at Concordia University in 2024.


Résumé en français

La production primaire d’aluminium repose toujours sur le procédé Hall-Héroult, pratiquement inchangé depuis 1886, et demeure responsable d’une part notable des émissions mondiales de CO₂. Une revue critique réalisée par Lama Mahmoud, doctorante à l’Université Concordia sous la supervision des professeurs Aïmen Gheribi et Mamoun Medraj, s’attarde sur un point précis mais coûteux : le contact entre la tige d’acier, le manchon en fonte et le bloc de carbone de l’anode. Cette interface est à l’origine d’un problème thermo-électro-mécanique couplé, où la chaleur provoque une expansion qui fissure le manchon, ce qui augmente la résistance électrique et génère encore plus de chaleur.

L’analyse retrace chronologiquement les avancées : la modélisation par éléments finis de Gunasegaram et Molenaar (2015), l’ajout de clous d’acier testé avec succès chez EgyptAlum par Shamroukh (2020), puis des décennies de perfectionnement des méthodes de mesure de la diffusivité thermique du graphite, un matériau dont le comportement anisotrope reste mal caractérisé dans les conditions réelles d’opération.

Le constat principal : ces trois axes de recherche, matériaux, mécanique des contacts et modélisation des cellules, ont évolué en silos, sans données industrielles réelles pour les relier. La revue propose donc un concept inédit : transformer le joint tige-carbone en composant adaptatif, combinant revêtements nanostructurés conducteurs, structure maillée 3D absorbant l’expansion thermique, et capteurs intégrés alimentant un modèle prédictif. Pour la grappe industrielle québécoise, où chaque gain de tension se traduit en mégawattheures économisés, cette approche pourrait combler l’écart entre les correctifs actuels et les technologies de rupture, comme les anodes inertes, encore en développement


Full version in English – The Anode’s Hidden Cracks: Inside the Race to Make Aluminium Smelting Less Wasteful

Every kilogram of primary aluminium still carries the ghost of an invention from 1886. A new critical review out of Concordia University traces how three decades of research on a single, stubborn weak point, the joint between the anode and the cell, is converging toward a smarter, more instrumented future for the potlines.

Walk into any reduction room and the scene looks almost unchanged from a century ago: rows of carbon blocks, dipped into a molten bath, slowly consumed as electricity tears alumina apart. The Hall-Héroult process has barely evolved since its 1886 patent, yet it still accounts for a meaningful share of the world’s industrial electricity bill and roughly one percent of global CO₂ emissions. For an industry under growing pressure to decarbonize while demand for aluminium is expected to double within a generation, that combination of old chemistry and high stakes has turned a once-obscure engineering detail, the contact between the anode’s steel stub and its carbon block, into one of the most closely studied junctions in the smelter.

Lama Mahmoud, a PhD candidate at Concordia’s Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Aerospace Engineering working under professors Aïmen Gheribi and Mamoun Medraj, set out to map exactly how that research has evolved, and where it still falls short. Her comprehensive review, submitted this past March, reads less like a textbook and more like a detective story: every fix uncovers a new layer of the problem.

A Process That Loses More Than It Should

The numbers tell their own story of inefficiency. Basic thermodynamics says it should take about 1.2 volts to drive the reduction of alumina into aluminium, the minimum the chemistry itself demands. In a real potline, cells run at 4 to 4.6 volts, nearly four times that theoretical minimum. Some of that gap is unavoidable chemistry: gas bubbles forming at the anode, resistance through the molten bath. But a sizable portion simply leaks away as heat at points of poor electrical contact, nowhere more so than where the steel stub meets the cast-iron thimble and the carbon block itself. That junction sits at the centre of what researchers call a thermo-electro-mechanical problem, or TEM for short: heat creates expansion, expansion creates pressure and cracks, cracks raise electrical resistance, and that resistance generates yet more heat. It is a feedback loop baked into the anode’s own geometry, and it shows up physically as fracture lines radiating from the cast-iron thimble, visible proof, sitting on the floor of every smelter, that the anode assembly is fighting itself.

Tracing the Fixes, Decade by Decade

Mahmoud’s review follows the trail of solutions chronologically, and the pattern is telling: each generation of researchers solves one piece of the puzzle while leaving the next one exposed.

It starts in 2015, when Australian researchers Gunasegaram and Molenaar built one of the most complete finite-element models of the stub-to-carbon interface, simulating how thermal expansion, material creep, and contact pressure interact to drive up voltage loss. Their work was thorough but stayed in the realm of simulation, strong on theory, light on field validation.

Five years later, a team led by Shamroukh tested a far more hands-on idea at the EgyptAlum smelter: pack extra steel nails into the anode’s stub hole to improve contact. The intervention worked, shaving roughly 30 millivolts off the voltage drop per anode, translating, at smelter scale, into well over a million dollars in annual savings. The fix proved itself in production and has since been commercialized industrially. But it answered an engineering question with an engineering patch, leaving open exactly how the nails would hold up against years of thermal cycling and creep.

In parallel, a separate research thread was tackling a more fundamental gap: nobody could reliably measure how heat actually moves through graphite, the anode’s core material, across the wide temperature swings it experiences in service. Work going back to Parker’s original 1961 flash method has been refined repeatedly, most recently by Wang and colleagues, who mapped how laser pulse width and sample thickness distort thermal diffusivity readings between room temperature and 1500°C, and by teams adapting the technique to capture graphite’s anisotropic behaviour, since heat does not travel the same way along the grain as across it. Each refinement made graphite’s properties easier to characterize precisely, but none of it had yet been tied back to the mechanical and electrical side of the anode assembly.

That, Mahmoud argues, is exactly the missing link.

Where the Threads Should Meet

The review’s central insight is less about any single fix than about the gap between the fixes. Mechanical interventions like the steel-nail patch were tested without rigorous mechanical-fatigue modelling. Sophisticated finite-element models were built without anchoring graphite’s anisotropic thermal and electrical behaviour in real measured data. And the handful of dynamic cell models that do exist, most notably one published in 2021, rely on simplified assumptions like uniform electrolyte flow, and stop short of real-time optimization grounded in actual smelter data.

In other words: three communities have been independently chasing the same anode, each holding a different piece of the puzzle, with surprisingly little cross-pollination between materials science, contact mechanics, and process modelling.

A New Concept on the Table

Building on that diagnosis, the review proposes a concept that goes beyond simply combining existing fixes. Rather than treating the stub-to-carbon joint as a static piece of hardware to be patched once during assembly, it could become an instrumented, adaptive component. The idea layers three elements together: conductive nano-coatings, graphene or carbon-nanotube films, applied directly to the stub and thimble surfaces to shrink the air gaps that drive up resistance from day one; a 3D conductive mesh structure inside the joint that can flex with thermal expansion instead of cracking against it; and embedded sensors feeding temperature and voltage data into a model trained on real anisotropic graphite properties, allowing operators to anticipate, rather than simply react to, contact degradation as an anode ages.

It is, in effect, a proposal to turn one of the smelter’s oldest, least visible components into a feedback-aware system, closing the loop between materials characterization, mechanical design, and live operational data that the existing literature has so far kept in separate silos.

Why This Matters Beyond the Lab

For an industry cluster like Quebec’s, where primary aluminium production sits at the intersection of energy strategy and climate commitments, shaving even a few hundred millivolts off the anode’s voltage drop is not an academic footnote, multiplied across hundreds of thousands of tonnes of annual output, it is measured in megawatt-hours and in tonnes of avoided CO₂. As smelters worldwide also watch the slower-moving but more radical promise of inert anode technology edge toward commercial reality, the kind of incremental, well-instrumented gains described in this review remain the bridge that keeps today’s potlines competitive while tomorrow’s alternatives mature.

The anode, in short, still has secrets to give up, and the next round of savings may come less from a single breakthrough material than from finally getting materials science, mechanical engineering, and real-time data to read from the same anode at the same time.


Pour contacter Lama Mahmoud

To contact Lama Mahmoud